[Prev][Next][Index]
Pakistan A Haven For Terrorists, Says Pressler
-
To: Ajay Shah (editor@rbhatnagar.ececs.uc.edu)
-
Subject: Pakistan A Haven For Terrorists, Says Pressler
-
From: jit <abdutta@icaen.uiowa.edu>
-
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 13:33:08 -0400
-
From ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu Thu Apr 20 13: 48:42 1995
-
Reply-To: abdutta@icaen.uiowa.edu
-
Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:55:16 -0700 (MST)
-
Resent-From: Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu>
-
Resent-Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.950420105516.28515B@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu>
-
Resent-To: editor <editor@rbhatnagar.ececs.uc.edu>
-
Sender: talk@SARASWATI.MIT.EDU
This is from misc.news.southasia.
Source: News India-Times, New York, April 19, 1995
Pak A Haven For Terrorists, Says Pressler
Special To News India-Times
NEW YORK: Senator Larry Pressler last week called Pakistan "a safe
haven for terrorists," adding that "Pakistani officials have been
advising the terrorist state of Iran how to start its own nuclear program."
In a hard-hitting op-ed article in The New York Times April 16, the
South Dakota Republican argued that congressional approval of US
aid to Pakistan "would be a huge mistake."
Pressler maintained that a law he sponsored in 1985, banning US
economic and military assistance to Pakistan as long as that
country pursues a nuclear-weapons program, be reaffirmed.
Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto lobbied for a repeal of the Pressler
Amendment during her recent visit to the United States. President
Clinton, after talks with Bhutto, pledged to ask Congress to relax
the ban on aid.
Pressler said Pakistan is now said to have enough material to
assemble at least six bombs, adding that it is also building a
nuclear reactor that would give it access to vast amounts of
plutonium to construct even more nuclear bombs.
"President Clinton should demand that Pakistan abandon its nuclear
agenda," Pressler said.
"Sizable aid in any form would be seen as a reward for Pakistan's
nuclear ambitions. It would deliver a blow to regional peace,
generate renewed hostilities and a nuclear arms race between
Pakistan and India and increase the likelihood of nuclear weapons
falling into terrorist hands," Pressler added.
"We cannot condone, through taxpayer assistance, Pakistan's
becoming a nuclear power."
In an interview with The Washington Times, Pressler said that
before Bhutto arrived in the United States, he attended a CIA
briefing that convinced him Pakistan's program goes beyond simply
having the nuclear capability it already acknowledges.
"Pakistan has about five weapons ready to go and India has between
five and 10," the senator said.
The Washington Times noted in the interview that "the Pakistani
nuclear program poses a direct challenge to the US goal of stopping
the spread of nuclear weapons."
As Pressler's assertions about Pakistan's nuclear program and its
adverse impact on South Asia's stability continued, Clinton
administration officials sought to advance their point of view.
John Holum, director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency,
told foreign correspondents that he did not know which CIA briefing
Pressler attended had led the senator to conclude that Pakistan
possesses nuclear weapons.
Holum, a bitter critic of the Pressler Amendment, said that what
the US has learned is that Pakistan has the capability to assemble
a nuclear weapon in a short time.
Robin Raphel, assistant secretary of state for South Asian affairs,
echoed Holum's position. She told reporters: "Let me repeat what
we've often said on this very question, and that is that we believe
that Pakistan could assemble a relatively small number of nuclear
devices on relatively... short time frame. We say precisely the
same about India."
Defending his position, Pressler said: "There is a price for a
nation's decision to go nuclear. Mr. Clinton must realize that
there is a greater global price for not upholding the only
effective piece of nuclear non-proliferation law on the books."
He said, "The message sent to countries such as Iraq, North Korea
and other rogue states by the Clinton administration as it
continues to attempt to make an exception to US law is dangerous
and potentially destabilizing."