[Prev][Next][Index]
Re:Aham Brahmasmi - 2of 10
> From: sadananda@anvil.nrl.navy.mil (K. Sadananda)
> the big.) Essentially it is the infiniteness. In infinity there are no
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> parts, even mathematically.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I was on my way to becoming a theoretical mathematician before deciding
to become an electrical engineer, so please explain what you mean here. In
mathematics, infinity very definitely has parts, and there are even different
levels of infinity, named as X_0, X_1, etc (the X is a crude approximation
to the Hebrew character "aleph"). Similarly, the infinity used to describe
integers is strictly smaller than the infinity used to describe reals, and
so on.
Analogies? I don't know....
Yours,
Vijay
