[Prev][Next][Index]
Re: Vedanta discussions
Once again, Vidya tries to talk abou that which he knows _nothing_
In article <3eeu1f$pee@ucunix.san.uc.edu>,
Vidyasankar Sundaresan <vidya@cco.caltech.edu> wrote:
>Your philosophy does not even acknowledge that jivanmukti is possible
You are _dead wrong_ here. Sukadeva Goswami was a nitya-siddha,
just as were the gopis of Vrndavan, the intimate associates of Lord
Ramacandra, and so forth. The Vaisnava philosophy perfectly well
acknowledges the existence of nitya-siddhas; in fact, there is no
point following anyone who doesn't speak the message of the
nitya-siddhas. Others, such as Narada Muni, were krpa-siddhas,
who received complete devotional service by dint of service to
great devotees; and sadhana-siddha can also take place in _this life_
itself, so long as one redevelops prema.
-- Vijay
