[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Sri Tattva-muktavali
-
To: alt-hindu@cis.ohio-state.edu
-
Subject: Re: Sri Tattva-muktavali
-
From: susarla@owlnet.rice.edu (Hari Krishna Susarla)
-
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 95 02:19:13 GMT
-
From news@larry.rice.edu Tue Jul 11 23: 09:03 1995
-
Newsgroups: alt.hindu
-
Organization: Rice University, Houston, Texas
-
References: <3tujba$7hu@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
In article <3tujba$7hu@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Raymond Crawford <dasa@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>Perhaps I am jumping the gun here, but I feel I have to say something.
>to 1,000 years ago by Sriman Madhvacarya:". I just thought I would mention
>this in passing as you are always berating others about being precice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>I am hopeing some other well versed Dvaitin will be so kind as to clarify
this
>point for Michael as we all know how much a stickler for correctness he is.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Raymond, it's funny that you should accuse MT of such things, when you are the
one who keeps posting your own personal (and usually inaccurate) versions of
Gita verses everytime someone else posts verses from an authorized translation
of the Gita. One would think you were trying to imply that your translations
were somehow more correct.
At least if your translations were accurate, I could accuse you of being the
stickler for correctness. But then, maybe your problem with MT is that he
likes being accurate and honest while you like pushing through with your own
opinions. So, I guess that speaks more of envy on your part, does it not?
-- HKS
EDITOR'S NOTE: THIS IS THE LAST IN THIS SERIES OF PERSONAL ATTACKS ON BOTH
THAT I WILL ACCEPT. PLEASE AVOID PERSONAL ATTACKS ON ALT.HINDU, HELP KEEP
THE DISCUSSION ON THIS NEWSGROUP ON A HIGHER PLANE. THANK YOUR FOR YOUR
COOPERATION ...AJAY SHAH
