[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Reply to Tolerance towards other Religious Viewpoints by MMSK
In his reply to Shri Krishna Susarla's comments, Shri Muthuram Sujanakumar
wrote that he agrees with my statement that "God is not an object." But he
disagrees with my statement, "abstract God Brahaman." According to Webster's
dictionary the word "abstract" means - a quality apart from an object.
Let me assure MMSK when I wrote the statement "abstract God Brahman" I do not
imply that God is a theoretical concept! English is a fine language, but it
has its shortcomings such as the above statment. It is quite possible to
get two completely opposite viewpoints from the same sentence!
Let me take this opportunity to congratulate MMSK for his excellent reply
to Shri Krishna Susarla's comments. Shri HKS points out number of times
about "dishonest interpretation of Geeta by others." Shri HKS is reminded
that his interpretation of Geeta falls into the same category cautioned by him.
There is a famous saying "Don't preach somebody what you cann't follow?"
No true devotee of Lord Krishna will dare to misinterpret his (her) own
master's quotations for personal gains and glories. Lord Krishna, the protector
of Dharma will not Tolerate such Adharmas!
" Have a Good Day "
"Truth is a pathless land, and you cannot approach it by any path
whatsoever, by any religion, by any sect. Truth, being limitless,
unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be
organized; nor should any organisation be formed to lead or to
coerce people along any particular path." J. Krishnamoorthy
=========================||=============================================
| Ram V. Chandran || email: chandra2%ers.bitnet@vtbit.cc.vt.edu |
| 6623 Westbury Oaks Ct. || internet: chandran@econ.ag.gov |
| Springfield VA. 22152 ||============================================|
| USA || Phone: 703-912-5790 (H) 202-501-7082 (W) |
=========================++=============================================
