[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Dvaita and Advaita: A Reconciliation - alt.hindu #2828
-
To: alt-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: Dvaita and Advaita: A Reconciliation - alt.hindu #2828
-
From: mpt@mail.utexas.edu (michael tandy)
-
Date: 10 Jun 1995 03:30:43 GMT
-
From news@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu Fri Jun 9 23: 19:21 1995
-
Newsgroups: alt.hindu
-
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
-
References: <3rap16$kd6@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
In article <3rap16$kd6@ucunix.san.uc.edu>, manish@cadence.com (Manish Tandon) says:
>So in the Gaudias, it is only the later asampradayas like Hare Krishnas who
>say that sayujya is impersonal liberation talk of avoiding even thinking
>about liberation.
Perhaps then, you will kindly explain the following verse from
Srimad Bhagavata Mahapurana:
salokya-sarsti-samipya-
sarupyaikatvam apy uta
diyamanam na grhnanti
vina mat-sevanam janah
"Pure devotees do not accept any kind of
liberation--salokya, sarsti, samipya,
sarupya, or especially ekatva (sayujya)
even though these are offered by the Lord."
--3.29.13
In addition, would you please explain who considers the Hare
Krishna movement an asampradaya, and how they arrived at such
a conclusion?
-m
