[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: IMPORTANT Administrivia: Soc.Religion.Hindu Reorg RFD Discussion
-
Subject: Re: IMPORTANT Administrivia: Soc.Religion.Hindu Reorg RFD Discussion
-
From: vijaypai@rice.edu (Vijay Sadananda Pai)
-
Date: 17 Dec 1995 21:13:28 GMT
-
Approved: srh <srh@rbhatnagar>
-
Article: 762 of soc.religion.hindu
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: none
srh@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu (srh) wrote:
>I have posted the Request For Discussion (RFD) for the newsgroup
>soc.religion.hindu on this forum.
ok
>Although, understandably, I am strongly opposed to the RFD, I will
>allow posts from both the sides of this issue to appear on Soc.Religion.Hindu
>I will however, continue to reject the posts if they contain personal attacks.
Err, Ajay-ji, then why on earth did you allow Raj Bhatnagar's post;
you know, the one where he said Shrisha Rao was acting like a child,
that the proponents of SRH were trying to be net-gods and that
all the proponents of the SRH reorg are suffering from hurt egos?
If you would like, I can resend that one to you so you can verify
that it did indeed say all these things.
>This is a particularly trying time for all those who have supported SRH.
I supported SRH when it was time for a vote in July and now I will
support this reorg. There is no contradiction.
>And I look forward to your cooperation in this regards.
>Sincerely,
>Ajay Shah
>Moderator, Soc.Religion.Hindu
Yours,
Vijay
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderator: Ajay Shah Submissions: srh@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu
Administrivia: srh-request@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu
Archives: http://rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu:8080/soc_hindu_home.html
