[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH reorganization
In article <4d2a35$6oj@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <editor@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu> wrote:
[...]
>Surely, those not associated with SRV creation as you were, will see the
>direct connection. The evaluation of performance as a moderator etc. is
>mostly based on skewed statistics any way.
This claim surfaces again - the "skewed statistics" claim has been
often repeated, and that's why I added the elaboration message, which
was posted to SRH.
Could you please _prove_ your claim that the statistics are skewed? I
provided a means of proving the accuracy of the statistics in my
message, and it would be helpful if you did the same. In this matter,
it seems that the statistics are either accurate, or they are not, and
a simple test should suffice.
-Vivek
P.S. Note to Vinod Nairji - in your note about the right way of
pointing things out, you claimed that these statistics would have
helped reduce the response time. As I pointed out in that note, they
would only have helped if Ajay believed them. His continued assertion
that they are "skewed", without any backing evidence, suggests to me
that this matter is one where I would've expended a significant amount
of energy with no results.
(Thu Jan 11 12:01:49 CST 1996)
References:
