[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Is Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups the Goal?
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: Is Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups the Goal?
-
From: gopal@ecf.toronto.edu (GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana)
-
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 07:41:04 -0500
-
Followup-To: soc.religion.hindu,news.groups
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
-
References: <4csfms$its@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <DLC2Gu.B60@ecf.toronto.edu> <4djksd$a61@solaris.cc.vt.edu>
-
Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
In article <4djksd$a61@solaris.cc.vt.edu>,
N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>: In article <4di8kt$fq0@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
>: N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
>: >GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
>: >
>: >: [you might consider expressing your views in prvt mail to
>: >: any proponents, if experssing them publicly can hurt
>: >: others]
>: >
>: >Is this politics or what!!!!
>: >
>: >The s.r.h is not a jageer of Ajay Shah or a Pai.
>: >Nachiketa Tiwari
>
>: (1) no. it is not politics, just a courtesy. not every one
>: likes to make comments about *others* in public, espeically
>: if they were to be negative [some one already pointed out:
>: we are washing our dirty linen in public]
>
>If there is dirty linen, then all of us should know.
>Esp. when it comes to matters of Dharma.
>
>: (2) anyway, did you not, in some other thread suggest that
>: Ajay Shah should select his team of moderators?
>
>How does that relate to the above!!!
[no offence intended against ajay shah, it is just a
restricted reply, to make a point]
(1) expressing his reservations against composition of moderatosrs
in a personal email, IFF he feels such a mesg could cause
embarassment to the people involved, amounts to srh being his
jageer,
(2) srh will *have* to be moderated *only* by him or a team to be
*chosen* by *him*, means that s.r.h. is *not* his jageer
(this is Tiwari N's assertion.... paraphrased )
is the above what you want to say?
[i have not started *jageership* comments. I am only showing that
such comments should *not* have been made]
