[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH: Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups is the Goal
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: SRH: Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups is the Goal
-
From: gopal@ecf.toronto.edu (GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana)
-
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 12:57:40 -0500
-
Followup-To: soc.religion.hindu,news.groups
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
-
References: <4d4hpn$6jb@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4df2u5$69s@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4dks6h$kh8@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4dp0ai$kf8@sundog.tiac.net>
-
Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
In article <4dp0ai$kf8@sundog.tiac.net>, Arun Malik <vri@tiac.net> wrote:
>And the name of the newsgroup was humanities.language.sanskrit, not
>soc.religion.sanskrit. Reasons based on religous doctrine limiting
>publication of sanskrit text are not appropriate to that group. The
>only reason listed below that would be a valid criticism is the lack
>of diacritical marks.
>
>There is no need for _instruction_ in its use, for it to be handed
>over by a guru, etcetera, as the newsgroup is not a religous
>newsgroup!
[i might be wrong, but] did we meet in sci.j-k thread some time ago?
are you the same guy complaining that S Rao should have included
religion based discussion for soc.CULTURE.i.j-k group, despite his
repeated cries that he considered 'reasons based
on religious doctrine is not appropriate for that non-religion
*culture* group'?[paraphrased]. are you the same guy that said
acknowledgement of sufi saints to kashmir is not adequate, and
that he should have explicitly written about islam as a religion
in kashmir?
[if i am *not* wrong -- that you are the same guy --] then i have this
to say:
hi, how do you do? *what a transformation*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
regards
G.Sree Ramana Gopal
