[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg: Why Bring In Political Biases?
In article <4cb5f0$bng@babbage.ece.uc.edu> ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu (N. Tiwari) writes:
> Your post is self contradictory. The post of Partha was pretty
> political. It explicitly blamed the cow belt and VHP politics for issues
> related to dowry. YOu somehow think that such type of mix of religion and
> politics is good, and is fit enough to be posted in s.r.h.
>
> But when Rajiv Varma posts something similar (like the invasion of Islamic
> warriors) and explores the impact of that on the Hindus, you get pissed
> off. Things like these are obscure, and fit enough for talk.religion.hindu.
I have always maintained that neither of these posts
are appropriate for soc.religion.hindu.moderated. I have
*never* approved in any way of the acceptance of Partha's
posts.
Please do not put words in my mouth.
Mani
