[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg: Personal Vendetta : Conclusive Proof!
In article <4cdess$dln@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <editor@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu> wrote:
>
>Here is a paragraph that will clearly show the intention of the proponents of
>SRH re-org.
>-------excerpt from an earlier post from one of the re-org proponents----
>[*chomp*]
>
>
>However, what is worrying is that there is a 2:1 majority
>requirement for passage, which means that unless two out of every
>three spam victims decide to vote yes, the group is in danger.
[...]
>there is
>already a groundswell of support which will not be easily denied, and
>if Dr. Maharaj and Mr. Shah manage to stop SRV using their fraudulent
>practices, then they will face a tidal wave of opposition that will
>uproot them from their home territory.
[..]
>Shrisha Rao
is there more to the story than what has appeared during RFD debate
on news.groups?
What do 'spam victims' and 'fraudulent practices' supposed to signify?
Can some one help us to understand the context?
