[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE: Weak to the strong, Strong to the weak - An article by
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE: Weak to the strong, Strong to the weak - An article by
-
From: shrao@nyx.net (Shrisha Rao)
-
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 15:07:16 -0600 (MDT)
-
References: <ghenDzuz7w.FF8@netcom.com>
John Mitchell <nj49@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
> > mean, the man is at best a mediocre artist who has over long decades
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Is that why Hussain's paintings were destroyed by BD and SS goons?
No; that isn't why. They were destroyed so that we'd have a chance to
hear from you on SRH, and thus be fulfilled.
> Just speak for yourself. If you are speaking any other organization, then
> say so!
And you, sir, ought to have enough common sense to know that if
someone is not openly affiliated, and not signing for, some
organization, then he is indeed speaking for himself.
> His paintings will now sell like hotcakes because of the BD, SS goons.
Thanks for the tip. Know where I can place an order?
> > Mail posts to: ghen@netcom.com : http://www.hindunet.org/srh_home/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Home page for the new Ayotollahs!
Thanks again. Negative advertizement of websites is at least as
effective as positive. I'm sure the HinduNet people are quite
pleased. (In case you're curious: I have nothing to do with that
site, or its sponsors.)
But I'm curious -- is there some specific thing at that website that
irks you, or are you generally riled at anything called `Hindu'? If
the former, what is it that irks you? If the latter, what the hell
are you doing on this newsgroup anyway?
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
--
http://www.rit.edu/~mrreee/dvaita.html
(Home page for the old Ayotollahs!)
