[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Puraanas
shrao@nyx.net (Shrisha Rao) wrote:
[...]
> To my mind, the most important aspect one needs to look at to judge
> the worth of a doctrine is its style of reasoning, apart from its
> conclusions. That is, one has to ask every teacher, show and justify
[...]
In relation to the above, I have a few questions on Dvaita:-
1) How does Dvaita justify the apaurusheyatva of Shruti (or whatever shruti
it claims whose apaurusheyatva can be justified at present) vis-a-vis the
claim of unauthoredness made by any other party (not necessarily under the
vedic fold) of some text popular within its circle?
2) How does apaurusheyatva entail faultlessness ?
Is there an English translation of "pramANa lakSaNam" ?
-Sourav
