[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Censor Indecent hindus
Subject: Re: Censor Indecent hindus
faesong@AZStarNet.com wrote:
> Discussions of Hindu religion has been considered indecent many times
>in the past by tyrants. Accusations of paganism have censored all such
>discussion. The tantric beliefs have been called obscene and censored more
>than once, in this decade.
Maybe not just by tyrants! But also by moderators! Just a few days
ago I tried posting some questions about the Kam Sutr and Ramayyan
to Hindu newsgroup and they got rejected! I was told that I should
ask my questions on alt.sex instead! When I asked again on newsgroup
soc.religion.hindu, the moderator said my message was indecent
and that's why he censored it!
> The Exxon Bill being signed today would make anything deemed indecent
>by the right wind Christian polticians a crime. This crime will make
>indecency on the internet punishable by a 250,000 dollar fine plus a
>mandatory 2 years in prison.
Let us appose this Exxon bill, but we appose censorship also in general!
I wonder why your post got accepted to Hindu newsgroup, even though
it is just about US politics, but my post where I talked about
political issues in Hindu parties in India gots rejected!
> faesong.
Brother Faesong, I wish you love and light! Love and light and no
censorship!
*************** THIS NEWSPOST PREPARED *******************
*************** WITH LOVE AND LIGHT BY *******************
*************** RAVINDER "BOBBY" GUPTA *******************