[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH: Umpteen complaints about existing moderation policy
-
To: srh@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu
-
Subject: Re: SRH: Umpteen complaints about existing moderation policy
-
From: kstuart@snowcrest.net (Ken Stuart)
-
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:53:54 GMT
-
In-Reply-To: <4ekluh$90t@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
-
References: <4di85q$fo6@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4dks3g$kh1@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4e8vkg$oi5@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4ekluh$90t@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
-
Reply-To: kstuart@snowcrest.net
On 30 Jan 1996 08:47:13 GMT, vri@tiac.net (Arun Malik) wrote in
soc.religion.hindu:
> But to refuse to post it would be censorship based on content
That is exactly what a moderator is supposed to do.
If you want total lack of censorship, then read unmoderated groups.
Note: This is not a comment on whether any particular post in SRH
should have been rejected or not.
Namaskar,
Ken
kstuart@snowcrest.net
