[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Administrivia : Request For Opinion Regarding Word....
This post would normally be sent to the moderator directly, and
that's the approach I took recently, but I've since been asked
to direct questions about these Administrativia requests to the
newsgroup.
In article <4i5c3t$ioq@babbage.ece.uc.edu>, SRH Editor <srh@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu> writes:
|> SRH charter does forbid the posts that denigrate Hindus/Hindu dharma.
|> However, before a decision is made on this issue, I would like to get
|> your opinion.
What can and cannot be changed through these Administrativia requests?
Specifically, how much of the charter can be modified, either explicitly
or in practice?
|> As always, we will adopt a consensus position
What exactly does this mean?
How exactly does one propose to build a consensus or
decide when one is reahched?
As a side note, when I last asked about the status of the "English-only"
amendment to SRH, I was told that a decision still had not been made.
Is that still the case, and if so, at what time does a decision get
made? I presented some valid arguments for why I felt SRH should _not_
become English-only, and I have yet to see any replies to them.
-Vivek
