[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Interpretation of verses (was Re: ISKCON etc)
In article <4il7t8$9fh@babbage.ece.uc.edu>, Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian <rbalasub@ecn.purdue.edu> writes:
[...]
|> And I wonder why the issues of this circular Padma puraaNa stuff hasn't been
|> addressed already. I have to yet see a post attacking the meat of my post,
|> viz, this whole Padma puraaNa thing:
[...]
|> I dare you to once address the more important issues. But then, it goes down to
|> the core of your beliefs, which you may not want to question.
I believe I already addressed this issue, using your own logic:
"Do you fail to see your own hypocrisy? You are supposedly railing on
Prabhupada for your perception that he talks about stuff which he
doesn't understand, in your opinion, but now, you're asking me to
believe that you've somehow proved some circularity of logic in the
Padma Purana? Thanks, but I'll pass. The irony is just too heavy."
-Vivek
