[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: rules regarding Administrative changes
For posting to srh
On 5 Apr 1996 04:49:47 GMT, Ajay Shah
<ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote in soc.religion.hindu:
>
>Dear SRH Readers,
>
>Namaskar,
>
>Vivekji's question regarding "what constitutes consensus" has been
>answered adequately on this forum and privately. There is, in my
>opinion, at this time no further need to codify the Administrivia
>procedures on this newsgroup.
>
>Briefly, the procedure is as follows.
>
>Anyone can suggest improvement in the functioning of the newsgroup.
>
>If it seems aggreeable to a reasonable no. of people we implement the
>changes.
>
>This, in my opinion, reflects a very open nature of moderation.
What is the definition of "a reasonable no. of people" and how is it
determined that "a reasonable no. of people" find it agreeable ?
PS A reasonable no. of people find it agreeable that I will be
President of the United States, so the election on November 5th has
been called off.
Thanks,
Ken
kstuart@telis.org
