[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Status on RFD on reorganization of soc.religion.hindu
In article <ghenDu7Hs6.Apy@netcom.com>,
rajwi@otto.bu.edu (Rajwinder Singh) writes:
|> Reagrding this controversy about reorganization, I suggest the
|> proponents of reorg create new newsgroups which do not involve the
|> current newsgroup at all. If their claims are true, and the newly
|> created newsgroups are really great as compared to the current SRH,
Before you make this suggestion, please note that this has
already been asked, and we were told that parallel groups
would not be allowed.
|> Another question: for a reorg, one of the requirements is excessive
|> traffic. SRH currently has _much_ lower traffic than would warrant
|> reorg.
An analysis of the effect of moderation on traffic was already
performed some time back, and the archives will show that the
analysis was correct - the traffic at any given time is a very
much a function of the time between moderation cycles. To verify
this data, you can look in the SRH archives, or you can look
at the analysis itself, available at
http://www-ece.rice.edu/~vijaypai/srh-stats.html
-Vivek
