[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH "moderation appeals committee" flaws
[will be posted to srh separately, in additiion to sci and news.groups]
In article <4skjsn$aal@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Zoli Fekete, keeper of hungarian-faq <fekete@bc.edu> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> As an aside with my note of condolances ;-), let me say that you ought
>to feel proud: in the past only the Muslims were famous for such
>intra-religion flamefests dragging news.groups in ;-(...
>
so nice of you to make such hornorable comments on two great
religions at one go. but the situation has nothing to do with
intra religious war. it is just a discussiion about the
adorable beliefs that usenet administration [whatever that means]
-- be it the Group Advice or n.a.n. moderator, or those silent
souls on the news groups -- has ,that: (1) "moderators own their
groups", (2) "moderators are mini dictators", (3) "moderators can
refuse to consent for a vote on any reorg proposal if they dont
like the first letter of the last name of one of the proponents"
(5)"if you offer moderatorship on reorg to current moderator,
that is not adequeate -- whether he accepts or not is the test
of whether the moderator is being unseated", and (6) "i agree
with all the above" .
and ofcourse, that our moderator of srh *refuses* to take a vote
