[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH INFO : Artificial Justification for Info Group
In article <4skjuq$ab8@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
>I hope that the intelegent readers of this newsgroup will use the "Skip"
>or "Next" key and keep reading the useful material, seeing through this
>little trick, in addition to personal vendetta, petty politics and
>repetitious posts.
Here's the latest cute accusation, but once again, the flaws are
apparent.
I respond to articles accusing me of skewed statistics, and what
happens - the same charges are made again and again.
I spend the time showing where the statistics came from, how they
were gathered, and how they can be verified, and that posting is
ignored.
Instead, the moderator keeps on claiming skewed statistics. I am given
4 points, and I respond to them all, despite the fact that they could
have been answered just by reading my previous explanation.
Now, for defending myself and answering every question put to me,
what's the latest charge? That my answers to all of the charges are an
attempt to raise the number of posts.
I'll make the moderator a deal - if he actually reads my replies
before making the same poorly-thought-out charges again, I won't have
any need to repost the same exact answers.
Instead, if he wishes to keep on ignoring my answer and making the
same charges, in some sort of Goebbelsian attempt to fool the readers,
I'll keep on answering the charges with the truth.
-Vivek
