[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

INFO : Vajrasuchi upanishhad




This is the translation of vajrasuuchi upanishhad of saamaveda. Vajrasuuchi
means diamond needle. This translation is taken from the book 'Thirty
Minor upanishads' translated by Narayanasvami aiyar and published by the
Adyar Press, Madras.

**

	I now proceed to declare the vajrasuuchi - the weapon that is the
destroyer of ignorance- which condemns the ignorant and praises the man of 
divine vision.
	There are four castes - the braahmaNa, the kshatriya, the vaishya,
and the shudra. Even the smritisdeclare in accordance with the words of 
the vedas that the braahmaNa alone is the most important of them.
	Then this needs to be examined. What is meant by the braahmaNa ? 
Is it a jiiva ? Is it a body ? Is it a class ? It is GYAna ? Is it karma 
? Or is it a doer of Dharma ?
	To begin with : is jiiva the braahmaNa ? No. Since the jiva is 
the same in the many past and future bodies (of all persons), and since 
the jiiva is the same in all of the many bodies obtained through the 
force of karma, there jiiva is not the braahmaNa.
	Then is the body the braahmaNa ? No. Since the body, as it is 
made up of the five elements, is the same for all people down to 
chaNdAla-s, etc., since old age and death, dharma and adharma are found 
to be common to them all, since there is no absolute distinction that the 
braahmaNas are white-colored, the kshatriyas red, the vaishyas yellow, 
and the shudras dark, and since in burning the corpse of his father, 
etc., the stain of the murder of a braahmaNa, etc., will accrue to the 
son, etc., therefore the body is not the braahmaNa.
	Then is a class the braahmaNa ? No. Since many rishis have sprung 
from other castes and orders of creation - RishyashR^iN^ga was born of 
deer; kaushika, of kusha grass; jaambuka of a jackal; vaalmiki of 
valmiika (an ant-hill); vyaasa of a fisherman's daughter; gautama, of the 
posteriors of a hare; vasishtha of uurvasi (a celestial nymph in the 
court of Indra); and agastya of a water-pot; thus have we heard. Of 
these, many rishis outside the caste have stood fist among the teachers 
of divine wisdon; therefore a class is not the braahmaNa.
	Is GYAna the braahmaNa ? No. Since there were many kshatriyas and 
others well versed in the cognition of divine Truth, therefore GYAna is 
not the braahmaNa. 
	Then is karma the braahmaNa ? No. Since the praarabdha, sanchita, 
aagami karmas are the same for all beings, and since all people perform 
their actions impelled by karma, therefore karma is not the braahmaNa.
	Then is the doer of dharma (virtuous actions) the braahmaNa ? No. 
Since there are many kshatriyas, etc., who are givers of gold, therefore 
a doer of virtuous actions is not the braahmaNa.
	Who indeed then is braahmaNa ? Whoever he may be, he who has 
directly realised his aatmaa and who is directly cognizant, like the 
myrobalan in his palm, of his aatmaathat is without a second, that is 
devoid of class and actions, that is free from the faults of faults of 
the six stains (hunger, thirst, grief, confusion, old age, and death) and 
the six changes (birth, existence etc), that is of the nature of truth, 
knowledge, bliss and eternity, that is without any change in itself, that 
is the substratum of all the kalpas, that exists penetrating all things 
that pervades everything within and without as aakaash, that is of nature 
of undivided bliss, that cannot be reasoned about and that is known only 
by direct cognition. He who by the reason of having obtained his wishes 
is devoid of the faults of thirst after worldly objects and passions, who 
is the possessor of the qualifications beginning with saama (dama, 
uparati, titikshaa, samadhana, sraddha), who is free from emotion, 
malice, thirst after worldly objects, desire, delusion, etc., whose mind 
is untouched by pride, egoism, etc., who possesses all these qualities 
and means-he only is the braahmaNa.
	Such is the opinion of the veda, the smritis, the itihaasa, and 
the puraaNa-s. Otherwise one cannot obtain the status of a brahmaNa. One 
should meditate on his aatma as sachchidaananda, and the non-dual 
brahman. Yea, one should meditate on his aatma as the sachchidaananda 
brahman. Such is the upanishhad.

**
AUM tat.h sat.h


Advertise with us!
This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.