[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorg FAQ
[will be posted to srh separately -- in addition to sci and news.groups]
In article <4skjv0$abb@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Ajay Shah <ajay@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu> wrote:
>On Wed, 17 Jul 1996, GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana wrote:
>
>>
>> how can the proponents shove anything on the throats of srh readership?
>> they have been asking for a vote on the proposed separation of articles
>> into thoese that are primarily religious and those others that deal
>> with any other aspect hindu and hindism. if you are referring to the
>
>SRH charter, voted on overwhelmingly provides sanction for the posts that
>include various aspects of Hindu dharma, culture and issues. It was
>posted yesterday, and is available in the archives.
i know that the *current* charter allows almost anything conceivable.
i hardly find any moderation going on srh, and that is why i consider
the reorg proposal is an improvement to the current srh.
i do not agree with the notion that once a charter is voted on,
it should run for ever. there is no need for any third party
assessment. you can yourself see any other religious group, and see
if srh seems to be a moderated group at all. what is wrong in
asking for a change of charter and a moderation policy?
