[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : This reorg thing is spoiling SRH
In article <4smovo$2ki@babbage.ece.uc.edu>, sns <sns@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>This reorg thing is spoiling SRH and damaging it.
>It is a pitiful that a few fanatics can do so much
>damage to a group. I would like to request
>vivek et all to start some other group and name it
>and organize it however they want and leave
>SRH alone. I think SRV also needs re-organization
>or atleast new groups like soc.religion.madhwa
>,soc.religion.ramanuja need to be created.
Hi!
I was hoping you'd come back with answers to my reply on the
Hindu-vs-Vaishnava questions you raised, but you haven't. Still
hoping.
Please note that it is not "a few fanatics" who insisted that the
reorg discussion be on SRH -- the moderator did. Also, if you wish
the reorg discussion to take place behind the readers' backs, I'm sure
yours is not the majority view.
Btw, you have my fullest support if you want to present an RFD for
reorganizing SRV -- but please don't go in for any specific Maadhva
group, as part of the reorg or otherwise, because there isn't enough
of a voter base for it. We're quite happy with the mailing list
format. At least for now. In case you do decide to include such a
group in your proposal, keep in mind that your document will be
critiqued for philosophical accuracy by Maadhvas.
Awaiting your RFD...
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
>sudheer
