[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: SRH ARTICLE : The Re-Organisation Mess



In article <4sn4e7$j1u@nyx10.cs.du.edu>, Shrisha Rao <shrao@nyx.net> wrote:
>2> One cannot know if all the people one is asking mean the same thing
>when they agree -- how does one account for differing understandings
>of the same word?  If, to take an extreme example, there is a
>Vaishnava who thinks that `Hindu' means "an ambidextrous person," and
>he happens to be one, then he might say he's a Hindu, although he
>means something altogether different than what someone else who gives
>the same answer does.  Thus, in the absence of a common notion back of
>the questions and answers, one cannot claim agreement even if there is
>unanimity.

Well, it seems that being a Hindu (well, in the article I'm about to
provide, it's spelled Hindoo) is actually promoted as a _racial_ and
_cultural_ (but not a religious) characteristic by the BJP. Of course,
I expect that some people would find this objectionable, but this
article appeared on soc.religion.hindu recently, and I haven't seen
anyone denounce it on the basis that its definition is somehow
racist. I'm including it at the end of this note since it wasn't seen
in the other newsgroups.

Oh, yes, and before anyone accuses me of BJP-bashing, please note the
next-to-last line of the article: 

|> Published  by Bansilal Sonee for Bharatiya  Janata  Party 

What's really interesting is the following: if this definition if
Hindus is used on the newsgroup as the acceptable one, and we take the
moderator's statement on face value that any articles about human
rights violations against Hindus are acceptable on SRH, then we have
an interesting situation:

every article about human rights violations in India is on-topic for
soc.religion.hindu

-Vivek

In article <4qvba3$pck@babbage.ece.uc.edu>, 
ashok <ashokvc@giasbm01.vsnl.net.in> wrote:
|> 
|> Title : "All Indians are Hindoos"
|> Author : Maxwell Pereira
|> Publication : Hindustan Times
|> Date : June 3, 1996
|> 
|> It  was Grandpa Joseph who first told me I was  a  Handy. 
|> May  sound incongruous, but then one would need  to  know 
|> more  about  gran'pa  to  appreciate  his  reasoning.  As 
|> grandfathers  go,  mine fitted into the  typical  mould-a 
|> simple man  with lean but towering personality, wearing a         
|> `dhoti'  and a buttoned up coat, not much  educated,  but 
|> highly respected in society. His face weather beaten, and 
|> remnants  of a muscular body on a hardy  frame  betraying 
|> signs  of  the  vigour and strength of by-gone  days.  He 
|> preferred  the circular velvet encased flat `topi' to the 
|> turban,   both   of  which  went  well  with   the   then  
|> Mangalorean  elite  attire that added  dignity  to  one's 
|> bearing  and  personality. And he wore  his  large  round 
|> watch  at the end of a silver chain that emerged  from  a 
|> buttonhole,  to  be ensconced in  a  smaller  pocket-like 
|> special  pouch on one  side of his coat. I  missedin  him 
|> though,   the  burly  untrimmed  moustache   that   other 
|> grandfathers   of   the  time  sported,   including   the 
|> occasional cigar between the lips and the walking  stick-
|> used more for style than support-all of which, my gran'pa 
|> just shunned.                                             
|> 
|> A  godfather to everyone in the neighborhood, he was  the 
|> one  to be consulted by all and sundry  for guidance  and 
|> advice  on  matters varying from  how best  to  take  the 
|> maximum  yield from one's  land to matrimonial  alliances 
|> or  family disputes. And he was the one always chosen  to 
|> say a few  words of comfort at a bereavement. But most of       
|> all,  gran'pa  was  that  kind  and  lovable  soul,  most  
|> endearing  to his grand children, always entertaining  us 
|> with  jokes, his toothy smile and  his  witty  anecdotes. 
|> Lack of formal education  was never an impediment and one 
|> often wondered  where and how he acquired all his fund of            
|> knowledge--be  it  on history or any subject  under   the 
|> sun.                                             
|>                                                      
|> So  it  was  that gran'pa educated  me  much   before  my 
|> schooling days on the advent of the  Saraswats and of the 
|> Aryans  coming  into  Indian around  two  thousand  years 
|> before  the recorded birth of our Lord Jesus  Christ.  Of 
|> their establishing a culture and crystallising a religion
|> of  their  own on the fertile plains of the land  of  the 
|> five  rivers.  Of  the Indus and  the  Ganges  and  their 
|> tributaries,  on  the  banks  of  which  flourished   the 
|> civilisation of this handsome race. From granpa's stories 
|> I learnt that Saraswats hailed from the banks of the  now 
|> extinct   river   Saraswati  which   along   with   river 
|> Drishadvati  were the two tributaries of the river  Hakra 
|> that then ran parallel to the Indus.
|> 
|> Joseph  quoted to me from the Book of Esther the  mention 
|> of Indian in the Bible. when King Assuerus the Great  had 
|> reigned  over a hundred and twenty  seven  provinces-from 
|> India to Ethiopia. That the word Hindoo in those Biblical
|> times  and thereafter, was only a corrupted form  of  the 
|> word  Sindhu,  which was the correct name for  the  river 
|> Indus. That Hindoo stood for one who hailed from the land 
|> of the Sindhu. And the land of Sindhu as was recorded at
|> that  point of time in history in most ancient  books  of 
|> the  Hindus, was known as Sapta-Sindhu, referring to  all 
|> 
|> the  seven rivers together-the tributaries of  the  Indus 
|> and  the Hakra. On the banks of these seven  rivers,  the 
|> original Aryan tribes of the `Puru's and the `Kuru's, the 
|> 'Bharata's   and  many  others,  had  established   their 
|> kingdoms. 
|> 
|> Gran'pa  Joseph  Kamath himself believed that  he  was  a 
|> Hindoo  first, as was believed in the times of  yore,  of 
|> everyone  that  lived within  the  Indian  sub-continent. 
|> According  to  him, there were Hindoos who  followed  the 
|> Hindoo   religion,  Hindoos  who  followed   the   Muslim 
|> religion,   and  Hindoos  who  followed   the   Christian 
|> religion. 
|> 
|> But all were Hindoos first-as aptly put by poet lqbal  in 
|> `Hindi  hain  hum, votan hai Hindustan hamara'.  And  the 
|> people of foreign nations and foreign tongues do well  to 
|> refer to all Indians as Hindoo-even as Haj pilgrims from
|> India  are called `Hindoos' by the Arabs.  And it  hadn't 
|> surprised  me  when  on my visit to Japan,  I  noted  the 
|> Japanese  with  their  own intonation had  called  me  an 
|> `Indo' while indeed referring to me as a Hindoo.
|> 
|> (Courtesy: The Hindustan Times, 3.6.96)
|> 
|> Published  by Bansilal Sonee for Bharatiya  Janata  Party 
|> and Processed & Printed by EXCELPRINT, Delhi-6.



Advertise with us!
This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.