[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : SRH Moderation ...
In article <4svf4g$p05@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Prasad Gokhale <f0g1@unb.ca> wrote:
>This is regards the SRH organization "debate" pervading SRH !
>
>It is so unfortunate that *some* of the readers of SRH are resolved to
>oust the moderator, apparently, based on some reasons and evidence, which
>I personally find rather silly.
Not as silly, however, as the practice of mindless repeating of the
same falsehoods in the hope that some may mistake them for the truth.
>My postings to SRH have appeared without much time delays and without any
>editing, contradictory to the experience of some people on the net. I have
>no grievences against the moderator or his moderation policies.
Do you see any scope for improvement, or is the present a Utopia?
>It is amusing enought that the proponents of SRH reorganization are in a
>vendetta against the moderator (Ajay Shah), gone to extreme lengths of
>even creating a FAQ about this discussion. I wonder if they realize that
>there could hardly be anyone who is interested and reads their long posts,
>on the history of how things happened. One wonders why these people, who
>are coincidently associated with ISKCON, are ganging up to write against
>the moderator with so much anger and revenge ?
Who are "these people, who are coincidentally associated with ISKCON"?
I'm not. I have in fact been closely involved in setting up the
Dvaita home page and a mailing list for discussing Tattvavaada.
>It is would an altruist gesture if they concerned individuals stop their
>silly and worthless battle on the net and submit some good postings which
>may enlighten the readership, like myself. This would reduce more than
>half the unnecessary traffic filling SRH, and render the newsgroup more
>enjoyable.
Honestly, I think you're looking in the wrong place, for
enlightenment. Better chances if you find a peepul tree and meditate
under it.
Other than that, I think I have submitted a fair number of purposeful
postings to soc.religion.hindu and to its predecessor over the years,
and your comments cannot possibly apply to me.
>The moderator would not have any say on this : for either way, whether he
>allows any post on reorganization or entirely refuses to accept any posts
>on the topic, he will be turned into a devil.
>
>Please, for gods sake, grow up.
Preacher, heal thyself.
By the way, you referred to the reorg FAQ: did you actually _read_ it?
Regards,
Shrisha Rao
>-- Prasad Gokhale.
