[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Tale and the SRH-reorg (Was: Re: Charter changes?)
Hello,
In an eloquent manner, vidynath@math.ohio-state.edu (Vidhyanath K. Rao)
elucidated:
>For the benefit of news.group readers, I would like to add that Ajay
>Shah has appointed an appeals committee to hear appeals against
>his rejections. Should we not give them time to see how this works
>before another RFD goes out. [Yes, there must be another RFD. Too much
>time has gone by since the original RFD for the CFV to proceed.
>And if the new RFD does not explain why the appeals committee is
>inadequate, we will know what is going on.]
The major problem with this proposal is that SRH suffers from *too many* posts
being approved, not too many posts being rejected. If one Hindu ever thought
about the subject proposed, then that is enough for the post to be accepted.
:-) Furthermore, posts consisting of personal attacks on Hindu leaders have
been accepted, as well as, amazingly enough, requests for negative and
scandalous information about Hindu leaders.
A major aspect of the reorg proposal is to make the newsgroup
soc.religion.hindu, *not* soc.culture.hindu .
Cheers,
Ken <*>
kstuart@mail.telis.org
