Re: ARTICLE : Who decided that all vaishnavs are not hindus

• To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
• Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Who decided that all vaishnavs are not hindus
• From: mpt0002@jove.acs.unt.edu (Michael Tandy)
• Date: 9 Aug 1996 11:46:43 GMT
• Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu, news.groups, soc.culture.indian
• Organization: University of North Texas
• References: <4t1rf6$hba@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4t4h9h$bu0@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <ghenDv34F8.GnJ@netcom.com> <ghenDv4vtp.JyM@netcom.com> <ghenDvCC1y.I3C@netcom.com> <ghenDvp3A4.5KM@netcom.com> <ghenDvr9AL.BMt@netcom.com>

In article <ghenDvr9AL.BMt@netcom.com>, pendsepr@pilot.msu.edu says...
>
>Michael Tandy wrote:
	No I didn't. Get your quotes straight.
>> 
>> >    Now  please explain (snip)

	Here's what I actually said:
>
>>         I've never yet been given an authoritative (sastric) definition 
of
>>         the term "Hindu," and so I'm forced (like everyone else) to
>>         arbitrate one or more myself. [snipped]

>In the texts of the religion we now call hinduism, it is clear that 
hinduism 
>was thought of as the TRUTH and not one mode of belief. 

	However, I don't think you will be able to supply any quotes naming
	it as 'Hinduism.' As far as I can tell, none exist.

	Thanks for your reply. Hare Krsna,
	-m

• Prev: Re: ARTICLE : Stop !!
• Next: ANNOUNCEMENT : Come Hear the Silence!
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

Advertise with us!	This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites. Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.