[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: REQUEST : authenticity of the Mahabharata
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: REQUEST : authenticity of the Mahabharata
-
From: cramarao@neuron.uchc.edu (Chodavarapu S. Ramarao)
-
Date: 19 Aug 1996 22:10:22 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: Univ of CT Health Center
-
References: <ghenDwECGE.6D4@netcom.com>
-
Sender: -Not-Authenticated-[8091]@threed.uchc.edu
-
Xdisclaimer: No attempt was made to authenticate the sender's name.
In article <ghenDwECGE.6D4@netcom.com>
Mutt <k777@pacific.net.sg> writes:
> I'm curious...how much of what is said in the Mahabharata or
> Ramayana can be proven to be historically accurate by archaeologists ?
Well, you can visit the place of krishNAs birth in madhura, UP. its a
small dingy jail cell where krishNA was born under captivity to his
mother dEvaki. There is also the place kurukshEtra in haryAna where the
epic battle took place. And ayOdhya and dandaka forest still exist in
India.
>
> ..I am referring to the manner in which items in the bible have been
> verified by science...ie...events...ancient towns...personalities
Oh. Come on!!!!!!! you can not be serious, are you????? items in bible
have been verified by science?? are you referring to that asinine
proogram run by CBS a couple of years ago??? That's not science man!
thats National enquirer stuff. Or are you referring to the noah's arc
being rebuilt in PA??? The places in India exist just as bethleham and
jerusalam exist in the middle east. no more. no less.
regards.
