[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : SRH Reorganization
Vivek Sadananda Pai wrote:
>
> In article <ghenDv34F0.GLG@netcom.com>,
> N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
> >Nothing more. That fact that there is a chance that the
> >4 proposed moderators can marginalize Ajay, is a good
> >reason to think so, since Ajay will be only ONE out of
> >those four.
>
> Gopal's compromise proposal specifically stated a 5-member moderation
> panel, with Ajay on the panel and Ajay hand-picking 2 of the other 4
> members, leading to 3 out of 5 people on the panel being people you
> and Ajay could theoretically trust. This plan would have voided your
> argument, but as I recall, neither you nor Ajay commented on it.
>
> -Vivek
> -- I have just got back on the newsgroups again and I see
that just like Hindus everywhere, as soon as one Hindu
moves up, other pulls his / her leg.
I see that Vivek and his friends have been on this reorg
(of SRH and /or SRHV) for last six to eight months. I think,
its about time WE STOP THIS NONSENSE of scrutnizing each and
every move by Ajay (or any other Hindu for that matter).
Why don't you consider asking nicely or (privately) if you
have any problem before getting all the dirty laundry out
in public.
Yours Truly
