[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Music Group Advertisements ( was Re: Vacuum Tree Head RETURNS Live in Oakland 14 Sept 96)
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Music Group Advertisements ( was Re: Vacuum Tree Head RETURNS Live in Oakland 14 Sept 96)
-
From: vivek@cs.rice.edu (Vivek Sadananda Pai)
-
Date: 9 Sep 1996 18:36:37 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: Hindu Students Conference, Rice Univ Chapter
-
References: <ghenDx64I6.21M@netcom.com>
In article <ghenDx64I6.21M@netcom.com>,
Global Hindu Electronic Network <ghen@netcom.com> wrote:
>It will be advantageous to all, if we cooperate in this matter, and seek
>to root out such spams rather than use such illegal acts to criticize the
>moderator.
Good advice, but I feel it is a bit unevenly applied. After all, was
not this same speaker the one accusing other moderators of censorship
and overthrowing charters not too long ago? Had he kept an open mind
before making those statements? Had he found out what spams were
being sent to other newsgroups before he criticized those moderators?
Of course, if someone would like to claim that the spam in question
was not off-topic, I'm sure that they wouldn't mind approving it for
SRH, right? Or is it that only other groups should suffer from spam?
-Vivek
