[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On attempting to define Hinduism)
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On attempting to define Hinduism)
-
From: dchakrav@netserv.unmc.edu (Dhruba Chakravarti)
-
Date: 10 Sep 1996 17:06:38 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: University of Nebraska Medical Center
-
References: <ghenDwHznC.9A0@netcom.com> <ghenDwqLww.Bpu@netcom.com> <ghenDwt2DE.ME1@netcom.com> <5077j1$rd2@news.ececs.uc.edu> <ghenDx64HG.1x3@netcom.com> <ghenDxBv2H.42w@netcom.com>
Vidyasankar Sundaresan (vidya@cco.caltech.edu) wrote:
: But you can't escape from intellectual interpretation of
: the scriptures.
Dear Sri Vidyasankar:
Thank you for reaffirming your views. I think Pradipbabu has corrected me
properly. All I meant was, although the intellectual interpretations are
helpful, but they provide only the GYAna, God gives us viGYAna as a
blessing (SBG 10.10-11), because the viGYAna knowledge is
revealed in atIndriya buddhi or extra-sensical intellect, also described
as bodhi(SBG 6.21), in other words, not amenable to intellectual
interpretations.
With best regards,
Dhruba.
