[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Test of a philosophy (Was Re: Biased...)
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Test of a philosophy (Was Re: Biased...)
-
From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@braincells.com>
-
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 12:49:46 GMT
-
Apparently-To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: Consolidated Braincells Inc.
-
References: <ghenDxH6x6.H0v@netcom.com> <ghenDxL7H0.KM6@netcom.com>
> > But it's definitely not correct to brand, in general, a philosophy as
> > accurate" just because it follows some "age-old" principles.
Well, I was talking about Hinduism specifically but in general as well I
think we can say a philosophy that can captivate peoples minds for
centuries is "better" than one that is dismissed immediately.
But "quality assurance" has always been a problem in philosophy. (Not
that I'm complaining, it meant three easy credits ;-)
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [jaldhar@braincells.com] o- beable .-_|\
Consolidated Braincells Inc. / \
http://www.braincells.com/jaldhar/ Perth Amboy-> *.--._/
"Witty quote" - Dead Guy finger me for PGP key v McQ!
