[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ADMINISTRIVIA : Matrimonials
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ADMINISTRIVIA : Matrimonials
-
From: vivek@cs.rice.edu (Vivek Sadananda Pai)
-
Date: 4 Sep 1996 19:52:34 GMT
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: Hindu Students Conference, Rice Univ Chapter
-
References: <ghenDwJuJy.1v3@netcom.com> <ghenDwqLwL.BLG@netcom.com> <504k0d$b0s@news.ececs.uc.edu> <5077j7$rdb@news.ececs.uc.edu>
In article <5077j7$rdb@news.ececs.uc.edu>,
Dhruba Chakravarti <dchakrav@netserv.unmc.edu> wrote:
>Dear Vivekji:
>
>Let's let Jaldharji write his article on this first.
Dear Dhrubaji,
I've seen what Jaldhar wrote on the 27th, and it makes sense - many
Hindus do consider Jati a valid criterion in matrimonial ads. Now, is
this to be considered casteism, and if so, should ads which mention
Jati be allowed on SRH, if ads are to be allowed at all?
-Vivek
