[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On
Dhruba Chakravarti <dchakrav@netserv.unmc.edu> wrote in article
<ghenDx9t1p.BzG@netcom.com>...
> H. Krishna Susarla (susarla.krishna@tumora.swmed.edu) wrote:
>
>
> Dear Hari Krishnaji:
>
> If I may, let me state the main theme of your arguments in two lines:
>
> GauDiya vaishhNavas are the only ones who are following sanAtana dhrama,
> an exclusive religion. The rest of us are following 'who knows what'.
>
> With best regards,
Let me state just one more thing -- If you really meant that, that you your
reply is meant with the best regards, then you would be better off not
misrepresenting my position. It does you no good to setup a strawman for
your attack. You and I both agree that sanaatana dharma is the subject of
Bhagavad-Giita. Therefore, let us argue in a civil way over the evidence in
the Gita. I am not interested in participating in a discussion if you are
going to use the classic Hindu approach of shouting your opponent down,
declaring him to be a fundamentalist, etc. just because he says things
which you cannot refute on the basis of shaastra.
Let's try to keep this discussion on a respectable level.
regards,
-- Krishna
