[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: ARTICLE : Just say no to "Hinduism" (was Re: ARTICLE : On
-
From: "H. Krishna Susarla" <susarla.krishna@tumora.swmed.edu>
-
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 1996 22:31:29 +0000 (GMT)
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: U.T. Southwestern Medical Center
-
References: <ghenDx64FJ.1D6@netcom.com> <ghenDx7vqz.5qJ@netcom.com> <ghenDx9t1p.BzG@netcom.com> <ghenDxBv2q.44z@netcom.com>
GERALD J. LA CORTE <l23@hopi.dtcc.edu> wrote in article
<ghenDxBv2q.44z@netcom.com>...
> : GauDiya vaishhNavas are the only ones who are following sanAtana
dhrama,
> : an exclusive religion. The rest of us are following 'who knows what'.
>
> If that is what started this thread, then I wish it were posted on SRV
No, that is just Dhruba using a classic Hindu distraction maneuver to move
the discussion away from something he is uncomfortable with dealing with.
It is frequently the case that Hindus pull this kind of nonsense to shout
their opponents down. It is a very clever tactic...
> instead of SRH. Unfortunately, the killfile works only on subjects and
> authors, not topics or belligerance.
...and unfortunately, it looks like someone else fell for it.
On SRV it would go unnoticed; on SRH
> its almost predestined to cause a fight. And here I quote the Christian
> Bible, "What you sow you will reap." Ahh, karma.
Yeah, karma is funny that way. What do you think the Christian Bible would
say about misrepresenting someone whose views you disagree with?
