 |
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|
Ram Gopalaswamy (tg@etsd.ml.com ) wrote:
>The words "nirGuna" and "Ananda" sound contradictory in the following
>Adavaitic cliche statements.
>(1) "nirGuna Brahman is the Supreme Reality"
^^^^^^^
>(2) "Brahman is Sat-Cit-Ananda"
^^^^^^
>Could someone explain with quotations from the Sruti ?
Ananda is not an attribute of Brahman in Advaita Vedanta. Brahman is Ananda
itself. It is not that nirguna Brahman becomes blissful but nirguna Brahman is
bliss itself. So there is no conflict between Brahman being nirguna and
Brahman being Satcidananda.
Regards
Pradip
|
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|