Re: Is this irreligious?
Subject: Re: Is this irreligious?
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Manish Tandon)
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 1994 15:57:36 GMT
Organization: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
email@example.com (Vidyasankar Sundaresan) writes:
|> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com (Manish
|> Tandon) writes:
|> > NO Vedic scripture (Vedas, Upanisadas, Puranas, Vedanta-sutra, and the
|> > two itihas - Ramayana and Mahabharat) ever say that Shiva or Parvati or
|> > Ganesha etc. have anything to do with what is beyond the three lokas
|> > 'tri-lokas', i.e. their status as 'devatas' is confirmed. They are
|> > **NOT** 'bhagavan.
|> As usual, you are again completely wrong. Read the Sri Rudram section of
|> the Yajur Veda and the SvetASvatara upanishad.
|> S. Vidyasankar
No, as usual, *you* are completely wrong AND despite my specifically
requesting that people post their so called references on the news group,
*you* didn't do it.
May I ask why??
I clearly said to include the ref so that people can *see* for themselves
how much your opinions are worth. Instead you continue with your cowerdice
and malice. I guess it is all part of the advaita philosophy.
shame on you.