[Prev][Next][Index]
Re: Is this irreligious?
-
Subject: Re: Is this irreligious?
-
From: manish@cadence.com (Manish Tandon)
-
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 1994 15:57:36 GMT
-
Apparently-To: alt-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Newsgroups: alt.hindu
-
Organization: Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
-
Sender: news@cadence.com
vidya@cco.caltech.edu (Vidyasankar Sundaresan) writes:
|> In article <38p1ja$f29@ucunix.san.uc.edu> manish@cadence.com (Manish
|> Tandon) writes:
|>
|> > NO Vedic scripture (Vedas, Upanisadas, Puranas, Vedanta-sutra, and the
|> > two itihas - Ramayana and Mahabharat) ever say that Shiva or Parvati or
|> > Ganesha etc. have anything to do with what is beyond the three lokas
|> > 'tri-lokas', i.e. their status as 'devatas' is confirmed. They are
|> > **NOT** 'bhagavan.
|>
|> As usual, you are again completely wrong. Read the Sri Rudram section of
|> the Yajur Veda and the SvetASvatara upanishad.
|>
|> S. Vidyasankar
No, as usual, *you* are completely wrong AND despite my specifically
requesting that people post their so called references on the news group,
*you* didn't do it.
May I ask why??
I clearly said to include the ref so that people can *see* for themselves
how much your opinions are worth. Instead you continue with your cowerdice
and malice. I guess it is all part of the advaita philosophy.
shame on you.
