HinduNet
  
Forums Chat Annouce Calender Remote
[Prev][Next][Index]

Re: Perfect understanding/Krishna consciousness




R & L Chilukuri wrote:

>Observations and Questions:
>
>1)      Note that the shloka has three words originating from the 
>root
>stha.
>        Thus steady, firm, or established is emphasized. Perhaps
>steadiness
>        in all aspects is a hallmark of such a being.

Most definitely. Here, the three compound words using the root stha 
are sthita-prajn~asya "of one who is situated in Krsna 
consciousness," samadhi-sthasya "of one situated in trance," and 
sthita-dhih "one fixed in Krsna consciousness." Arjuna is inquiring 
how such a person is situated, hence the root stha comes into play.

>2)      My first reaction to this shloka was -- "I dont really care 
>how
>such
>        a man sits, speaks or walks! He can be no different 
>(physically)
>        from other human beings in this respect!" Ramanuja does try 
>to
>        interpret "vrajeta" as "doing things" and "asita" as 
>"meditate"

Arjuna is inquiring about the symptoms of a pure devotee of Krsna. 
As Prabhupada points out, different kinds of men have different 
symptoms associated with them, and so too does the Krsna-conscious 
man. The most important of these, as you rightly noted, was speech. 
The Krsna-conscious man speaks only of Krsna and nothing else. 

Arjuna's questions about sitting and walking are (speculation) meant 
to elucidate the difference between the average person and the Krsna 
conscious person. Or perhaps by asking these basic questions he 
indicates that he wants to know all details pertaining to the Krsna 
conscious man. Another thing to consider is that 'walk' and 'sit' in 
this verse probably have the connotations which Ramanuja brought up 
in his translation (i.e. vrajeta meaning 'doing things' and asita 
meaning 'meditate'). That seems to make sense considering the way 
Lord Krishna answers this question in the next few verses.

>
>If there is sufficient interest, perhaps we can r\discuss the 
>remaine\der
>of
>Chapter 2 in this manner.
>

Yes, Chapter 2 is particularly good for discussion, since it 
summarizes all of the Gita's teachings. 

Yours,

-- HKS

------------------------------------------------------------------------
- H. Krishna Susarla - "Religion without philosophy is sentiment, or   -
- susarla@rice.edu   -  sometimes fanaticism, while philosophy without -
- Rice University    -  religion is mental speculation."               -
- Class of 1995      -                    -- Swami Srila Prabhupada    -
------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Unintelligent men, who do not know Me perfectly, think that I, the
Supreme Personality of Godhead, Krsna, was impersonal before and
have now assumed this personality. Due to their small knowledge,
they do not know My higher nature, which is imperishable and supreme."
                                         - Bhagavad-Gita 7.24




Advertise with us!
This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites.
Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.