[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH Reorganiztion Bias: Low Activity/Delays in Posting
Namaskar,
On Fri, 22 Dec 1995, Ken Stuart wrote:
> On 20 Dec 1995 22:43:22 GMT, the editor wrote in soc.religion.hindu:
>
> >I would like to point out a few facts, which might be useful.
> >
> >1. The postings are made 4-6 times a week.
>
> Only since the SRH Reorganization RFD was posted.
>
> Prior to that, it was *maybe* twice a week, and less during certain
> periods.
Please note, that some of the messages like the ones you have sent
about The Hindu Digest appear in the editor@rbhatnagar.csm..uc.edu
account. I do not process these messages frequently. Also, some
of the messages are submitted to alt.hindu, appear on editor@...
account, and I redirect them to srh account. So these messages
take longer time to process....all messages should be either mailed
to the correct account srh@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu or posted with
proper Newsgroup line. You can hardly blame the Moderator for
misdirected messages.
We may have archived the posts twice a week, so that the posts appear
to be posted twice a week to those who are reading the messages
through our web server.
Since the archival of newsgroup is quite a separate voluntary task
undertaken by GHEN. It need not be confused with the posts appearing on the
newsgroup. In fact any statistics derived from the archival dates are
bound to be skewed as well.
I have already indicated earlier that due to a major hardware upgrade,
there was one prolonged delay a while ago. But certainly, most people who
read this newsgroup will understand unusual circumstances. Afterall,
we have crossed 800 posts in less than 4 months!
>
> Even since the RFD, it is RFD-related posts that are made 4-6 times a
> week, otherwise it seems to take roughly a week for non-RFD related
> posts to be approved.
>
>
Please provide evidence of this. I clear the entire message queue. I do
not distinguish between the RFD and non-RFD posts. There have been *no*
posts which have been delayed simply because they were non-RFD related. In
fact, I have a few incoming files that you can check in the SRH Home page
for arrival timestamp. I welcome other readers who are being bombarded
by this "delay in posting" propaganda by the proponents of SRH
destruction to also take a look at these time stamps. If people wish, at
least for the foreseeable future, I am willing to save these incoming
files for time stamps.
http://rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu:8080/soc_hindu_home/12_19_95
http://rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu:8080/soc_hindu_home/12_21_95
http://rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu:8080/soc_hindu_home/12_22_95
> Cheers,
>
> Ken
>
> kstuart@snowcrest.net
regards,
ajay shah
References:
