[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: soc.religion.hindu -- a compromise plan
In the article <DK3un5.Fqo@ecf.toronto.edu>,
of Sun, 24 Dec 1995 19:11:28 GMT,
gopal@ecf.toronto.edu (GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana) wrote:
> In article <4bk5ul$rjh@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
> Dr. Jai Maharaj <jai@mantra.com> wrote:
>> Let us begin by renaming
>> soc.religion.vaishnava to soc.religion.hindu.vaishnava
>> The rationale is that soc.religion.hindu already exists
>> and that Vaishnavism is a branch of Hinduism:
>
> Was this not settled already? i thought soc.religion.vaishnava
> was already created.
By the above reasoning, soc.religion.hindu has also been created,
so why the move to reorganize it?
Actually, soc.religion.vaisnava was not created according to the
rules because an independent vote-taker was not used. The vote-
taker displayed extrem bias during the voting period. I have
posted the evidence to support that claim several times in
news.groups.
Jai Maharaj <jai@mantra.com> *-=Om Shanti=-*
%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%:%
