[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: SRH reorganization AND the right way to highlight a problem
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: SRH reorganization AND the right way to highlight a problem
-
From: gopal@ecf.toronto.edu (GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana)
-
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 21:23:21 -0500
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
-
Organization: University of Toronto, Engineering Computing Facility
-
References: <4cb5hq$bns@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4cnmvs$oa9@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4csg2u$j8e@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4cvius$3c@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
-
Sender: news@ecf.toronto.edu (News Administrator)
In article <4cvius$3c@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
V.S. Nair <cheaw260@emory.edu> wrote:
>
>He [V Pai] now says that presently posts only have a 2-day clearance delay .
>If
>only Vivek had gently pointed out this problem to the moderator instead
>of proposing a RFD we would all be spending our time discussing more
>pertinent issues. We should have a more amicable way of resolving
>disputes.
But that is the difficulty: how can one ask the moderator to spend
more time, when it is already a pro-bono thank-less job? On the
other hand if we have more moderators, such a demand on him will
get [relatively] eased.
[to Dr JM: I am not speaking for V Pai]
