[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Is Improvement of Hindu Newsgroups the Goal?
On 11 Jan 1996 06:18:05 GMT, Ajay Shah <editor@rbhatnagar.csm.uc.edu>
wrote in soc.religion.hindu:
>Namaskar,
>
>If improvement of the presentation of the Hindu newsgroups is the only
>goal that the proponents of SRH re-organization espouse, then the
>solution is very simple.
>
>I have already proposed that those who favor better representation of
>Hindu dharma on the net welcome, with open mind several new Hindu
>newsgroups. These newsgroups may be
>
>a. philosophy oriented, along the lines of SRV, such as
>soc.religion.hindu.shivism, etc.
>
>b. Specific scriptures oriented, such as:
>soc.religion.hindu.vedas
>soc.religion.hindu.bhagwadgita
>etc.
>
>c. Oriented towards customs etc. such as
>soc.religion.hindu.bhajans
>soc.religion.hindu.yoga
>etc.
>
>I am surprised that the proponents have shown no aptitude to such broad
>minded expansion of Hindu dharma on the net.
I don't know about the proponents, but I find nothing wrong with your
proposal above.
Since this is what you want, it very strongly implies:
1) You don't object to adding soc.relgion.hindu.info and
talk.religion.hindu on grounds of not enough traffic, since you
yourself have just proposed 5 new hindu newsgroups.
2) You would agree to the proposed compromise as long as it includes
the above 5 new hindu newsgroups, since you have clearly stated that
including these 5 newsgroups would demonstrate that the proponents'
only motive is improving SRH, and since you haven't made substantive
criticisms of the compromise itself, you must not find any fault with
it.
I'm glad that we've finally settled this whole situation, and look
forward to implementation of the compromise.
Namaskar,
Ken
kstuart@snowcrest.net
Follow-Ups:
References:
