[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
-
To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
-
Subject: Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
-
From: ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu (N. Tiwari)
-
Date: 13 Jan 1996 18:40:47 GMT
-
Followup-To: soc.religion.hindu,news.groups
-
Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu, news.groups
-
Organization: Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia
-
References: <4cdeis$de0@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4cgdqs$jpp@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4cnmrj$o9t@babbage.ece.uc.edu>
GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
: In article <4cgdqs$jpp@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
: N. Tiwari <ntiwari@rs3.esm.vt.edu> wrote:
: >GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana (gopal@ecf.toronto.edu) wrote:
: >Second, the moderators need not know Hinduism and in its full
: >complexity. However what we do need are the following:
: >
: >1. A moderator who is not prejudiced, in the sense that (s)he permits
: > all the posts, representing all the viewpoints reg. Hindu Dharma.
: >
: >2. A moderator, who filters out articles, which involve personal
: > attacks, and profanities.
: >
: >3. A moderator, who rejects articles, which are not related to the
: > Hindu Dharma.
: >
: Do i understand properly: you mean moderation is to be by our peers?
: so, IF for a moment we keep aside our views on the traffic, you dont
: have specific objections to the proposed moderators?
: --
No. But why the hell go around getting new guys, if we already have
a time tested moderator.
Remember, I say this, since as per your suggestion, I have kept all
the other issue aside. (Politics and upstaging of the current moderator
for one.)
--
Nachiketa Tiwari
=====================================================
750 Tall Oaks Drive 118 Patton Hall
Apt. # 3600 I Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA 24060. Blacksburg, VA 24061.
(540)-951-3979 (540)-231-4611
=====================================================
