[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
In article <4ciiec$ltl@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Mani Varadarajan <mani@srirangam.esd.sgi.com> wrote:
>This point has been answered again and again.
Well, I was away for about three weeks and don't know what has transpired
since then but am surprised to see this debate still going on.
>2) That being the case, I would like to see soc.RELIGION.hindu
> deal with the religious aspects of Hinduism -- i.e., discussions
> of religious ethics, God, upaasana, and related things. Please
> see the RFD for further details.
Post those articles and complain only if they are not accepted
by the moderator. Until them your RFD is devoid of any merit.
>Why can we not discuss the RFD's merits on its own without
>getting into all sorts of ad hominem attacks?
Have the articles on religious ethics etc. rejected by the moderators?
I don't think that is the case.
>
>Mani
>--
---Raj
