[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Why I support soc.religion.hindu: Reorganisation
In article <4csftl$j4v@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
GOPAL Ganapathiraju Sree Ramana <gopal@ecf.toronto.edu> wrote:
>But, I sincerely feel that the proponents too deserve
>some encouragement for their stupendous enthusiam to make
>the group more effective.
By all means; the proponents are requested to submit the type of articles
that they want to see on s.r.h. If those articles are rejected only then
they have a merit in their rfd. But that is not the case.
The only way to make a goup effective is not by forcing a moderator out.
Especially when in recent past the proponents and the current moderator
have differed on the name of soc.religion.vaishnava and the proponents
have shown their anger about it.
One way to make the group more effective along the lines the proponents want
is also to submit articles that they want to see on this newsgroup.
>Even at this moment they are asserting: that Ajay Shah
>is welcome to join the moderators. (I am therefore not
>convinced at all that they are out there to oust Ajay Shah)
There is no need to force additional moderators until the traffic
increases. To insist so much on the change of moderotors and not spend
the same time on submitting the desired type of articles is proof enough
that the proponents are after the moderatorship and the effectiveness
of group etc. is only of tangential concern to them, if at all.
---Raj
