 |
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|
You know, Sam, your reply to V. S. Pai's message is, as you said, "a perfect example to how people misinterpret stuff." On 19 Jan 1996, Sam Sanders wrote: > In <4dks5k$kh6@babbage.ece.uc.edu> vivek@cs.rice.edu (Vivek Sadananda > Pai) writes: > > You see in vijays posting ( given at the bottom )a perfect example of > how people misinterpret stuff just to get their own agenda of > reorganiation going.. > > vijay, for your info it is not "issa" upanishad ( as you pointed out ) > but ishopanishad ( isha + upanishad - a sandhi ) and we all know know > isha is a short form for ishwara. I am sure that Vijay is aware of the Isha Upanishad as it is one of the most important upanishads. Vijay was probably aware when he wrote of the Issa Upanishad (issa = yeshua = jesus). Secondly, the name Isha comes from the opening of the Isha Upanishad - "ishavasya". > > All the philosophies that have originated from the soil of India do come > under Hinduism, have a tremendous number of common ideas ( infact much > more than the christian denominations ) and all people that follow those > philosophies are Hindus. There is one large distinction between "Hindus" and Buddhists and Jains, that being that the latter two do not regard the authority of the Vedas. Anshuman Pandey
|
||
|
||
| Advertise with us! |
|
|