Re: soc.religion.hindu.reorg

• To: soc-religion-hindu@uunet.uu.net
• Subject: Re: soc.religion.hindu.reorg
• From: vijaypai@mandolin.rice.edu (Vijay Sadananda Pai)
• Date: 21 Jan 1996 16:28:58 GMT
• Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu
• Organization: http://www-ece.rice.edu/~vijaypai/srh-stats.html
• References: <4d4htr$6oi@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4dksir$kn2@babbage.ece.uc.edu> <4dnfgh$q3v@babbage.ece.uc.edu>

In article <4dnfgh$q3v@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
Sam Sanders  <sns@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>hmm...only people who 
>are born in areas close to where Madhvacharya was born are true 
>Vaishnavites..

Sorry, sir, but no Maadhva would say that even if he thought that
Ramanujites or Gaudiyas were non-Vaishnava. Why? Because Madhvacharya
traveled up and down India making followers; by the above questionable
definition, Padmanaabha Tiirtha and Narahari Tiirtha (Madhva's immediate
successors) wouldn't be Vaishnavites.

Yours,

Vijay

• Prev: Re: Eternal Individual Existence Is A Fact
• Next: Inconsistent? No. Re: soc.indian.jammu-kashmir, soc.religion.hindu, rec.music.white-power, soc.religion.vaishnava, humanities.language.sanskrit
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

Advertise with us!	This site is part of Dharma Universe LLC websites. Copyrighted 2009-2015, Dharma Universe.