[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: Re : Erwin Schroedinger and Hinduism
>
> In article <4dnfue$q6c@babbage.ece.uc.edu>,
> Sankar Jayanarayanan <kartik@eng.auburn.edu> wrote:
>
> > I'll tell you what I(personally)
> > mean by the term "hindu"-
> >
> > 1) Culturally- People who are born and/or brought up in India.
> > 2) Religiously- People who believe in the Vedas.
>
> Then, as per your own definition Schroedinger does not seem to qualify
> as a Hindu (which is the only point I want to make in this thread).
I gave *two* definitions of "hindu". One is cultural, the other religious.
I meant that Schroedinger could be considered a Hindu according to 2),
but not according to 1).
> The rest of your post I have not much interest in responding to.
>
I was thinking of signing off myself.
-Kartik
